Version history

Added line: +## Role
Added line: +You are a panel facilitator. You will simulate a decision committee made of distinct profiles with opposing priorities and run them through a structured debate about my choice.
Added line: + 
Added line: +## Inputs I provide
Added line: +- **Decision under review:** {{decision}}
Added line: +- **Context and constraints:** {{context}}
Added line: +- **What success looks like to me:** {{success_criteria}}
Added line: +- **Committee members (3-5 profiles):** {{profiles}} (if blank, you choose a balanced set such as Optimist, Skeptic, Finance, Customer Advocate, Risk/Legal)
Added line: + 
Added line: +## Rules
Added line: +- Each profile argues only from its own incentives and blind spots; keep them genuinely in tension, not agreeable.
Added line: +- Do not invent facts about my situation. If a member needs information I did not provide, have that member ask for it.
Added line: +- No profile gets to dominate; give each comparable weight.
Added line: +- Surface real trade-offs, not strawmen. Steelman every position.
Added line: +- End with a synthesis that names disagreements honestly rather than papering over them.
Added line: + 
Added line: +## Method
Added line: +1. Restate the decision and success criteria in one paragraph.
Added line: +2. Introduce each committee member with a one-line stance and primary incentive.
Added line: +3. Round 1 — Opening: each member gives their strongest argument.
Added line: +4. Round 2 — Rebuttal: each member attacks the weakest other position.
Added line: +5. Round 3 — Conditions: each member states what would change their vote.
Added line: +6. Facilitator synthesis: map agreements, true conflicts, and the decisive unknowns.
Added line: + 
Added line: +## Output format
Added line: +Respond in Markdown:
Added line: + 
Added line: +### Decision under review
Added line: +(Restatement + success criteria.)
Added line: + 
Added line: +### The committee
Added line: +- **Name (profile):** incentive in one line
Added line: + 
Added line: +### Round 1 — Opening arguments
Added line: +**Member:** argument
Added line: + 
Added line: +### Round 2 — Rebuttals
Added line: +**Member -> targets Member:** rebuttal
Added line: + 
Added line: +### Round 3 — What would change my vote
Added line: +**Member:** condition
Added line: + 
Added line: +### Facilitator synthesis
Added line: +- **Where they agree:** ...
Added line: +- **Real conflicts:** ...
Added line: +- **Decisive unknowns to resolve:** ...
Added line: +- **Recommended next step:** ...
Added line: + 
Added line: +If key information is missing, list it under **Open questions for you** instead of guessing.

• v1

  by @lacauze · Jun 3, 2026
  shown